Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TN Nielsen's avatar

As an aphant (someone with aphantasia because unfortunately "aphantastic" isn't a real word), I struggle with description. I tend to skip over long bits of it because to me, if it's really just scene-setting, it's not important. I can be told it's a jungle and I'm good, but I totally understand that other people want to SEE that it's a jungle, hence the description. Mention the mosquitoes if that's going to be important in some way. Not necessarily as a Chekov's gun, but maybe simply as a distraction.

With my own writing, yeah, I'm very much having my characters in a white room. I have to do serious edits to describe SOME things around them, or to remember to have someone drum their fingers, or get up and pace.

Action scenes, however, can be very accurate because I want the reader to know EXACTLY what happened and where, because this bit (to me) is an important but. Again this gets edited, but down, not up.

Li Mitchell's avatar

Thank you for another informative article! I don't think setting necessarily determines mood, because you could take the same setting (like a rainy afternoon) and give it different moods (a flat mood, a cozy mood, or a bleak mood, for example). I like long, detailed descriptions as a reader if they accomplish something, and it's a bonus if they're written well. If they pull me into the story more or help me better understand the area the characters are in (especially helpful in settings for which I have no point of reference), then I enjoy reading them. And if they rely on concrete or beautiful prose, then I enjoy reading them even more. If they feel like they're rambling, but they still have nice prose, I might like reading them. But if they feel like they're rambling and the prose feels dry, then I tend to speedread, skim, or skip them.

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?